The first reported clinical trial was conducted by James Lind in to identify treatment for scurvy. Fisher's experimental research and his writings popularized randomized experiments.
I'm responding just to bump this back to the top. Maybe posters will notice on the second try. I disputed this point, and Frank agreed with me: That translates to their being more expressive for those programs. That's the state of the art right now.
I have to imagine that you realize that when folks like Frank and I say "expressive," we are using the term formally, whereas your use of "more expressive" here is as a synonym for "more concise," and a major chunk of my point was that Frank and I had indeed already stipulated that untyped languages have a syntactic convenience benefit with respect to untyped code vs.
Indeed, this argument seems tautological to me. I'm saying that until these languages Advantages of the factorial design essay been demonstrated being used successfully in the scenarios where untyped languages excel e.
OK, I followed the link, read the three pages, and can't see anything there that untyped languages do any better than a good statically-typed language. I'm sorry, but it just seems like every time the dynamic language apologists put forth their position, it reveals that they haven't actually done much research into what's available, today, on the static typing side, nevermind what's on the cutting edge.
You quoted someone at Cambridge maybe Peter Sewell, but the link was messed up: I'm afraid that my conclusion remains what it has been for the past years: Good heavens, no, that wasn't a quote!
I said that, and regrettably, it remains my overwhelming impression. Basically I keep seeing a chicken-and-egg problem: At some point the type theorist begins to wonder how serious the untyped language apologists are about wanting improvement.
At least I do. This is more of the attitude that I'm arguing against: Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. Certainly there hasn't been anything resembling an effective rebuttal of any of the points we've made; there's just been a lot of repetition of the claim that static type theorists haven't proven the value of their work.
Well, if you won't download it and try it, there's really not a lot more to say. It never seems to occur to wonder whether there's something that's been overlooked in terms of real-world requirements.
Nothing would please me more than to see a set of real-world requirements from the untyped language side. What we get instead are "How does your static language handle a list that contains objects and a dictionary? It's easy from the academic side to get infatuated with the beauty of a narrowly-focused theoretical system, forget about the hairy issues of integration with the rest of the world, and then blame everyone else when the results aren't universally acclaimed as being useful.
Clearly, these are just academics unconcerned with the requirements of the real world. Muttering about "industry still can't be bothered to be rigorous" is just the easy way out.
But I see no evidence that industry has actually made a good-faith effort to determine whether some of the practical work that's been done in static typing is useful to them or not.
Since that's a generalization that can't be proven one way or the other, and at the considerable risk of personal insult, I see no evidence that you have made such a good-faith effort.
What I see is the same decade-old handwaving about how the Univ-based code that you write in an untyped language is awkward to express in a statically-typed language.
The problem with that is that it might be a non-trivial time commitment to do so.International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research. Advantages of the Factorial Design Essay ADVANTAGES OF THE FACTORIAL DESIGN Some experiments are designed so that two or more treatments (independent variables) are explored simultaneously.
Such experimental designs are referred to as factorial designs. At some point a longer list will become a List of Great Mathematicians rather than a List of Greatest Mathematicians. I've expanded my original List of Thirty to an even Hundred, but you may prefer to reduce it to a Top Seventy, Top Sixty, Top Fifty, Top Forty or Top Thirty list, or even Top Twenty, Top Fifteen or Top Ten List.
A free-trade agreement between Canada and the European Union would deal another blow to Canada’s already battered manufacturing sector, wiping out thousands of jobs in food processing, apparel making and the auto industry, according to an analysis of a potential agreement.
lausannecongress2018.com has been an NCCRS member since October The mission of lausannecongress2018.com is to make education accessible to everyone, everywhere. Students can save on their education by taking the lausannecongress2018.com online, self-paced courses and earn widely transferable college credit recommendations for a fraction of the cost of a traditional course.
All listed papers are published after full consent of respective author or co-author(s). For any discussion on research subject or research matter, the reader should directly contact to undersigned authors.